Axar Patel Makes Big Remark On Team India's 'Tradition': "Temple Visits Not A Bad Thing'
Player News
By Cricket Mantra Publisher
5 min read

Axar Patel on Team India’s Temple Tradition & Blunt Criticism of IPL’s Impact Player Rule

In the vibrant, often passionate world of Indian cricket, players are not just athletes; they are cultural icons whose words resonate far beyond the boundary ropes. Delhi Capitals skipper and India’s T20 vice-captain, Axar Patel, recently offered a compelling glimpse into two distinct facets of this world: the team’s spiritual ‘tradition’ of temple visits and

Share this article:

In the vibrant, often passionate world of Indian cricket, players are not just athletes; they are cultural icons whose words resonate far beyond the boundary ropes. Delhi Capitals skipper and India’s T20 vice-captain, Axar Patel, recently offered a compelling glimpse into two distinct facets of this world: the team’s spiritual ‘tradition’ of temple visits and the contentious strategic evolution of the Indian Premier League (IPL) through the ‘Impact Player’ rule.

Speaking candidly at a Delhi Capitals press conference ahead of the upcoming IPL 2026 season, Patel’s remarks, as reported, traversed from the spiritual to the tactical, providing valuable insights into the contemporary landscape of Indian cricket. This analysis delves into his observations, offering context and expert commentary on their broader implications.

‘Tradition’ of Faith: Axar Patel on Team India’s Temple Visits

One of the most observed, yet often undiscussed, ‘traditions’ of the Indian cricket team is its frequent visits to temples during bilateral series and major tournaments. This practice gained particular prominence during the T20 World Cup 2026, where players were seen visiting various temples both before crucial matches and, notably, after their title win. The image of captain Suryakumar Yadav, head coach Gautam Gambhir, and International Cricket Council (ICC) chairman Jay Shah visiting the Hanuman Temple in Ahmedabad with the trophy in hand became a powerful visual, symbolizing a blend of spiritual gratitude and national triumph.

When asked about this tradition and if he would continue it during the IPL, Axar Patel offered a pragmatic and insightful response. ‘Temple visits are not a bad thing,’ he stated, adding, ‘We go to temples where otherwise we wouldn’t be able to go. We have security with us during tournaments.’

Analysis: Beyond Piety – A Cultural Statement and Public Connection

Axar’s comments highlight several layers to this ‘tradition’. Firstly, it speaks to the deep-rooted spirituality prevalent in India, where expressions of faith often intertwine with daily life and significant events. For cricketers, who carry the hopes of a billion-plus nation, seeking divine blessings can be a personal source of solace and strength in high-pressure environments.

Secondly, his mention of security and access (‘We go to temples where otherwise we wouldn’t be able to go’) points to the unique privilege and experience that comes with being a national team member. These visits become opportunities to engage with places of worship that might otherwise be inaccessible due to their celebrity status, making the experience even more special for the players.

More broadly, these public displays of faith serve as a powerful cultural statement. For millions of fans, witnessing their sporting heroes engaging in such traditions fosters a deeper sense of connection and shared identity. It transcends the game itself, becoming a visible embodiment of shared values and beliefs. While personal faith is inherently private, the Indian team’s collective temple visits have evolved into a public ritual, a way of acknowledging the spiritual dimension that many Indians bring to their passion for cricket. It’s a decision, as Axar notes, often taken by players, reflecting a collective ethos that resonates deeply with the fan base.

The Impact Player Debate: An All-Rounder’s Dilemma

Shifting gears dramatically, Axar Patel also weighed in on one of the most significant tactical innovations in recent cricket history: the IPL’s ‘Impact Player’ rule. Introduced in 2023 and slated to continue until at least 2027, this rule allows teams to substitute a player from their playing XI with one of five listed substitutes at any point in the match. While designed to enhance strategic depth and provide more flexibility, it has become a lightning rod for criticism, particularly from all-rounders and those concerned about player development.

Axar’s stance was unequivocal: ‘I don’t like it.’ His bluntness immediately positions him among a growing list of influential voices, including India’s current white-ball captain Rohit Sharma and star all-rounder Hardik Pandya, who have expressed reservations about the rule.

Critiques from the Top: Rohit, Hardik, and Now Axar

Rohit Sharma, in 2024, articulated his concern that the rule ‘hampered the development of all-rounders in Indian cricket.’ Hardik Pandya echoed this sentiment the following season, noting that it had become ‘too difficult to pick an all-rounder in the side unless he was equally good with both bat and ball.’

Axar, himself a prominent all-rounder, provided a vivid explanation of this dilemma from a player’s perspective. ‘I don’t like this rule as I am all rounder myself (laughs),’ he began, highlighting the personal impact. He elaborated on the shift in team philosophy: ‘Earlier we used to pick all-rounder for this role (batting and bowling). Now team management goes with a particular batter or bowler, they say why do we need an all-rounder?’

He concluded with a mix of personal dislike and professional acceptance: ‘Being an all-rounder myself I don’t like it but at the same time rules are rules. We have to follow them. But personally I don’t like it.’

Analysis: The Erosion of the All-Rounder’s Value

Axar Patel’s critique is not merely personal preference; it’s a stark commentary on the structural impact of the rule on player roles and development. The essence of an all-rounder lies in their dual utility – the ability to contribute significantly with both bat and ball, offering balance and flexibility to the team composition. Traditionally, a team might sacrifice a specialist in one department to accommodate a versatile all-rounder who can bat in the middle order and bowl a few crucial overs.

However, the Impact Player rule fundamentally alters this calculus. Teams can now effectively have a 12th player, allowing them to bring in a specialist batsman when batting or a specialist bowler when bowling, without the previous constraint of having a player who can do both. For instance, a team might play a pure batsman for their innings and then substitute him with a pure bowler for the opposition’s innings, thus negating the need for a ‘bits and pieces’ player.

This tactical advantage, while perhaps making for more explosive T20 cricket, risks devaluing the all-rounder. Why invest in developing players who can do both competently when you can simply swap in a master of one craft? This could have long-term repercussions for Indian cricket, potentially leading to a scarcity of genuine, top-tier all-rounders who are vital across all formats, not just the IPL.

The concerns raised by Axar, Rohit, and Hardik highlight a tension between innovation aimed at immediate spectacle and its unintended consequences on fundamental cricketing roles and the ecosystem of player development. While rules are indeed rules, the collective voice of such prominent players suggests that a re-evaluation of the Impact Player rule’s broader impact may be warranted in the future.

Axar Patel: A Voice of Reason and Experience

In conclusion, Axar Patel’s recent remarks paint a fascinating picture of the modern cricketer’s experience. On one hand, he embraces and explains a deeply ingrained cultural practice that connects the team with its spiritual roots and the nation’s ethos. On the other, he bravely challenges a tactical innovation that, despite its intent, threatens the very role he embodies as an all-rounder.

As Delhi Capitals skipper and India’s T20 vice-captain, Axar’s words carry significant weight. His balanced perspective – acknowledging the virtue of tradition while also articulating thoughtful criticism of evolving rules – underscores his role not just as a player, but as a thoughtful contributor to the wider discourse surrounding the game. His insights are a powerful reminder that cricket, particularly in India, is a multifaceted phenomenon encompassing sport, culture, and constantly evolving strategy.


Disclaimer: Cricket Mantra aggregates breaking cricket news from multiple reputable sources, enriching them with in-depth analysis and expert commentary to provide comprehensive coverage for our readers.

Share this article:
Written by Cricket Mantra Publisher

More in this category:

Axar Patel on Team India’s Temple Tradition & Blunt Criticism of IPL’s Impact Player Rule - CrickMantra | Cricket Mantra