Source: NDTV Sports

Mohammed Siraj has, without doubt, become one of the most vital cogs in India’s formidable fast bowling machinery. His ascent, particularly in Test cricket, has been nothing short of spectacular, establishing him as a bowler capable of tearing through batting line-ups with pace, swing, and relentless accuracy. In a landscape where Jasprit Bumrah battles injury concerns and Mohammed Shami remains absent from international white-ball cricket, Siraj has naturally stepped into the role of the senior-most pace spearhead, carrying the immense responsibility that comes with leading an international attack.

However, even the most formidable athletes encounter periods of less-than-peak performance. Recent observations during the Test series against Sri Lanka and the subsequent ODI series against West Indies, which India clinched 2-1, have seen questions arise regarding Siraj’s rhythm and pace. This has naturally led to introspection and discussion among fans and experts alike. Providing a crucial perspective on this unfolding narrative is former India bowling coach Bharat Arun, a man intimately familiar with Siraj’s journey and development.

The Anatomy of a Temporary Dip

Bharat Arun, in a recent media interaction, offered a calm and measured assessment of Siraj’s current form, characterizing it not as a permanent decline but rather a ‘temporary loss of form’. This, he asserts, is something ‘bound to happen sometimes’ to any player, be it a bowler or a batter. This perspective immediately humanizes the situation, reminding us that even elite performers are susceptible to fluctuations.

Arun’s explanation delves into the specifics, highlighting a period of rest granted to Siraj prior to the Sri Lankan Test series. He noted, ‘he’s taken time away from, you know, cricket before the Sri Lankan series. Workloads he went through, and what his training programs were.’ The former coach further elaborated on the natural consequences of such a break: ‘sometimes after a long gap for any sportsman, it takes a little while to shed those small things that creep into your game.’

This insight is crucial. While rest is an indispensable component of modern sports for workload management and injury prevention, it can also disrupt a player’s intricate timing and muscle memory. For a fast bowler, who relies on a finely tuned kinetic chain from run-up to release, even a slight alteration can impact pace, control, and swing. The ‘small things’ Arun refers to could be anything from a fractional adjustment in wrist position to a barely perceptible change in run-up stride, all of which cumulatively affect output.

Rhythm: The Bowler’s True North

The solution, according to Arun, lies in rediscovering an element paramount to every bowler’s success: rhythm. ‘But very soon, with his experience, all Mohammed Siraj should be looking for is his rhythm. This is his biggest strength,’ Arun emphasized. He advised Siraj to ‘work towards ways of regaining his rhythm along with his coach,’ confident that he’ll ‘back to what to be what he was, in the past.’

What exactly does ‘rhythm’ entail for a fast bowler like Siraj? It’s a holistic state where the physical and mental aspects converge seamlessly. It’s the smooth, effortless flow of the run-up, the perfect co-ordination of the jump and gather, the optimal arm speed, and a high-arm release that allows the ball to leave the hand exactly as intended. When a bowler is ‘in rhythm,’ their actions feel natural, their control is precise, and their variations land accurately. Pace comes naturally, and the ball talks off the pitch.

A dip in rhythm often manifests as a slight loss of pace, a tendency for the ball to stray, or an inability to consistently hit desired lengths. For Siraj, whose aggressive bowling hinges on persistent pressure and wicket-taking deliveries, even a minor deviation can be noticeable. The advice to work with his coach underscores the importance of technical scrutiny and targeted training to iron out these ‘small things’ and restore the fluidity that defines his best performances.

Siraj’s Elevated Role and the Weight of Expectation

The current context further amplifies the scrutiny on Siraj. With Mohammed Shami out of the international white-ball picture since the Champions Trophy 2025 final and Jasprit Bumrah facing recurring injury concerns, Siraj has been thrust into the role of India’s premier multi-format pace bowler. This mantle carries immense pressure. He’s not just expected to perform; he’s expected to lead, to set the tone, and to be the go-to bowler in critical situations.

His impressive track record preceding this recent blip – particularly his Test exploits where he’s delivered impactful spells globally – speaks volumes about his character and skill. This very reliability, however, makes any dip in form stand out. India’s future across formats, particularly away from home, relies heavily on a fully firing Siraj, making his quick return to peak rhythm a high priority for the team management.

The Shami Conundrum: Form vs. Legacy

Beyond Siraj, Bharat Arun also touched upon the continued absence of veteran pacer Mohammed Shami, who has not featured for India since the Champions Trophy 2025 final. Arun’s stance on Shami is unequivocal and sheds light on a broader selection philosophy. ‘Well, to answer what Shami should be doing, I don’t think Shami needs to prove himself,’ Arun stated firmly. ‘You either pick him on form or you don’t. That’s, that’s going to be the case of Mohammed Shami. Shami does not need to prove what he can do to be picked into the Indian team. He’s proved enough across all formats.’

This commentary highlights a fascinating debate in team selection: how much weight should be given to past performance and established reputation versus current domestic or recent international form? Shami’s career statistics and match-winning spells in Test and ODI cricket are undeniable. He possesses an uncanny ability to extract movement, seam, and swing, often making crucial breakthroughs. Arun’s argument is that Shami’s body of work speaks for itself, and his quality is not in question. If selectors deem him necessary for a particular role or format, he should be picked based on his known capabilities, not subjected to a ‘proving ground.’

The implications of this viewpoint are significant for India’s fast bowling depth. If Shami is indeed to be considered purely on a ‘pick him or don’t’ basis, it means the team management has a clear idea of his current fitness and effectiveness. His experience, particularly in major tournaments, remains an invaluable asset, and a fit and firing Shami would undoubtedly add another dimension to India’s pace attack, especially when considering the demands of multi-format international cricket.

Looking Ahead: Challenges and Optimism

The current period presents a dual challenge for India’s pace battery: supporting Siraj through his temporary blip and strategically managing Shami’s potential return. For Siraj, the immediate task is clear: meticulous practice, technical adjustments, and a renewed focus on the core elements of his bowling to reclaim his signature rhythm. His past performances and resilience suggest that this ‘temporary dip’ will indeed be transient.

The commentary from Bharat Arun offers valuable context to these ongoing narratives. It reinforces the human element in sports, acknowledging that even the best can waver, and provides a clear pathway for Siraj’s recovery. Simultaneously, it articulates a strong case for Shami’s standing, underscoring the enduring value of proven experience. As India navigates a busy international schedule, the optimal performance and strategic utilization of both these pacers will be critical to their success.

---

Disclaimer: This article draws on reporting originally published by NDTV Sports, expanded with additional analysis and context by the Cricket Mantra editorial team.