Breaking News Analysis: The build-up to any ICC tournament for the Indian cricket team is always fraught with intense scrutiny, passionate debate, and often, a dash of controversy. The selection for the T20 World Cup 2026 appears to be no different, with Chief Selector Ajit Agarkar’s decisions drawing both praise and criticism. Amidst the discussions, former Indian spinner Harbhajan Singh has emerged as a staunch supporter of the selection panel, particularly commending Agarkar for his bravery and vision.

Harbhajan Singh’s Strong Endorsement for Agarkar’s Selections

Harbhajan Singh, a veteran of numerous World Cups himself, has given a ringing endorsement to Ajit Agarkar, the chief selector of the BCCI. Speaking to ANI, Harbhajan declared that Agarkar ‘should be given 10/10’ for the squad picked for the T20 World Cup 2026. This high praise comes despite the panel making several ‘controversial decisions,’ as noted in the original report, most notably the exclusion of young sensation Shubman Gill.

Singh acknowledged feeling ‘a little bad for Shubman,’ a sentiment likely echoed by many fans and pundits, given Gill’s immense talent and recent form in various formats. However, Harbhajan quickly added a reassuring note, stating that Gill ‘will get more chances soon.’ This implies a long-term vision from the selectors, perhaps prioritizing players with specific skill sets for the upcoming global showpiece rather than merely current form across all formats. Harbhajan’s ultimate faith in the squad is evident in his assertion that ‘all the players are match winners in their own right,’ and he expressed hope for ‘back-to-back World Cups because we have that team.’

The ‘Controversial’ Calls: Gill’s Exclusion and Kishan’s Inclusion

The exclusion of Shubman Gill is undoubtedly the most talked-about decision. Gill has been touted as a future captain and a multi-format star, and his absence from a major ICC tournament squad is bound to raise eyebrows. While the original content doesn’t delve into the specifics of why Gill was left out, it does highlight the inclusion of wicket-keeper batter Ishan Kishan, who was ‘rewarded for his form in the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy.’ This suggests a potential strategic shift by the selectors, possibly favoring T20 specialists or players demonstrating explosive hitting prowess in domestic white-ball competitions. Sanju Samson’s inclusion alongside Kishan further reinforces the emphasis on dynamic wicket-keeper batters, providing multiple options and depth in that crucial role.

This approach isn’t new in T20 cricket. Teams often opt for players who can provide specific roles or perform under pressure in a high-octane format, sometimes at the expense of established names who might excel in longer formats but not quite fit the T20 template perfectly. Agarkar and his panel seem to have taken a bold stance, prioritizing specific T20 capabilities over broader reputation, a move that Harbhajan Singh clearly approves of.

Backing the Core: Suryakumar, Hardik, and Bumrah

Harbhajan Singh also extended his support to key players in the squad, particularly emphasizing their potential to deliver on the big stage. Despite captain Suryakumar Yadav ‘not enjoying a good run of form lately,’ Singh expressed confidence, stating that ‘when the WC comes, we will need big players to fire. He will shine bright in that big match.’ This is a classic example of backing a proven match-winner through a lean patch, understanding that form is temporary but class is permanent, especially in pressure situations like a World Cup.

The former off-spinner singled out other players too, predicting game-changing performances. He believes ‘Abhishek (Sharma) can win you matches on your own,’ highlighting the dynamic young batter’s potential impact. Hardik Pandya, whose ‘form… he is in,’ makes him ‘a key player,’ according to Harbhajan, indicating the crucial all-round balance and explosive finishing he brings. The pace attack, featuring ‘Arshdeep (Singh) and (Jasprit) Bumrah,’ also received a nod, underscoring the importance of a strong bowling unit in T20 cricket.

The emphasis on match-winners like Suryakumar, Hardik, Abhishek, and Bumrah showcases a selection philosophy centered on individual brilliance capable of turning games single-handedly. This strategy, while risky, can be incredibly rewarding in the volatile format of T20 cricket.

Beyond T20: The Split Coaching Debate and Gautam Gambhir’s Mixed Fortunes

Interestingly, the original article pivots to a broader discussion on Indian cricket, specifically the contentious topic of split coaching and the performance of head coach Gautam Gambhir. This tangent, while not directly related to the T20 World Cup 2026 squad selection, provides crucial context on the current state of Indian cricket administration and team dynamics.

Gambhir’s tenure as head coach has been a tale of two halves. While he led India to lift the 2025 ICC Champions Trophy title in Dubai and has overseen good performances in white-ball formats, his record in Test cricket has been alarmingly poor. India suffered ‘two whitewashes at home in the last two years,’ a shocking development for a team that had built an ’empire’ in Test cricket under leaders like MS Dhoni, Virat Kohli, and Rohit Sharma for ‘over a decade.’

The ‘humiliating 0-3 loss to New Zealand in 2024,’ followed by a ‘0-2 thrashing at home by South Africa in 2025,’ are stark reminders of India’s struggles in the red-ball format. The New Zealand whitewash cost India a place in the ICC World Test Championship 2025 final, and the South Africa series could further jeopardize their WTC berth. These results contrast sharply with the white-ball success under Gambhir, intensifying the debate around the effectiveness of a single coach across all formats, especially in a cricket-mad nation like India where expectations are sky-high.

Harbhajan Singh’s commentary on the coaching role further illuminates the pressure cooker environment. He ’emphasised the responsibilities that come with becoming the coach of the Indian cricket team,’ noting that ‘in India, when the team does well, everyone stays quiet, and when the side performs poorly, everyone starts pointing out the coach.’ This observation underscores the precarious nature of the coaching role and the magnified scrutiny that comes with it, regardless of the format.

Looking Ahead: The Road to T20 World Cup 2026

As the focus shifts to the T20 World Cup 2026, the selections made by Agarkar and his panel, lauded by Harbhajan Singh, will be put to the ultimate test. The decisions, particularly regarding Gill’s exclusion and Kishan’s inclusion, signal a clear intent to build a squad tailored for the demands of T20 cricket. The backing of experienced campaigners like Suryakumar Yadav and Hardik Pandya, alongside emerging talents like Abhishek Sharma, suggests a blend of explosive power and strategic acumen.

The journey to lifting the World Cup trophy is arduous, but with a selection committee willing to make tough calls and former players like Harbhajan Singh providing their strong backing, India will be hoping this carefully curated squad lives up to the expectations and delivers on the promise of ‘back-to-back World Cups.’

---

Disclaimer: Cricket Mantra aggregates breaking cricket news from multiple reputable sources, enriching them with in-depth analysis and expert commentary to provide comprehensive coverage for our readers.