Glenn Maxwell Names Australia's Most Underrated Star: "Should Have Played More Test Cricket"
Player News
By Arjun Mehta
5 min read

Maxwell Champions Brad Hodge as Australia’s ‘Underrated Superstar’ & Test Cricket Regret

Source: NDTV Sports In the annals of cricket history, certain eras stand as formidable gauntlets, where extraordinary talent might find its path to prolonged international glory unjustly obstructed. Australia, in particular, has witnessed periods of such unprecedented depth that even cricketers of immense skill and prolific domestic records have been confined to the periphery of

Share this article:

Source: NDTV Sports

In the annals of cricket history, certain eras stand as formidable gauntlets, where extraordinary talent might find its path to prolonged international glory unjustly obstructed. Australia, in particular, has witnessed periods of such unprecedented depth that even cricketers of immense skill and prolific domestic records have been confined to the periphery of the national team. It’s a phenomenon that prompts reflection, sparking debates among pundits and fans alike about who, given a different turn of the historical wheel, might have etched their name more profoundly into the Test arena.

It is against this backdrop that current Australian all-rounder Glenn Maxwell, known for his explosive batting and astute cricketing brain, recently offered his insights on the ‘Keeping it Cricket’ podcast. Maxwell not only identified a former Australian star as ‘underrated’ but painted a poignant picture of a career that, by his estimation, was tragically curtailed by circumstances beyond the player’s control. His comments, coming from a contemporary who shared the dressing room, carry significant weight, shining a fresh light on a talent often admired but perhaps not fully appreciated for his immense capabilities.

Brad Hodge: The Star Denied a Fuller Test Legacy

The cricketer in question, according to Maxwell, is none other than fellow Victorian, Brad Hodge. Maxwell spoke with a sense of admiration that bordered on reverence, revealing, ‘Hodge was an absolute superstar. I had posters of him up on my wall and was lucky enough to play state cricket with him. To watch him live, it was incredible.’ Such a declaration from a player of Maxwell’s calibre underscores the profound impact Hodge had on aspiring cricketers of his generation, both on and off the field.

Hodge’s international Test career, in particular, remains a fascinating statistical anomaly and a testament to the sheer strength of Australian cricket in the early 2000s. He played just six Tests for Australia, a meagre tally that unarguably belies his exceptional talent and formidable record. Across those six appearances, Hodge amassed an impressive 503 runs in 11 innings at an outstanding average of 55.88. This included a magnificent double century, an unbeaten 203*, and two half-centuries, showcasing his ability to deliver substantial performances at the highest level. Yet, despite such a prolific output, his Test career remained frustratingly brief.

Maxwell’s analysis delves into the heart of this conundrum, attributing Hodge’s limited Test caps to the ‘stacked line-up’ of his era. This was a period when the Australian team boasted an embarrassment of riches, featuring bona fide legends such as Adam Gilchrist, Ricky Ponting, Michael Clarke, Michael Hussey, Justin Langer, and Matthew Hayden. Breaking into and maintaining a place in a side featuring such titans was an almost insurmountable challenge. Maxwell candidly observed, ‘In that era, if you were not averaging 50-plus, it was hard to stay in the side.’ Hodge was indeed averaging above 50, but even that wasn’t enough to secure a prolonged run in a team where every position was occupied by a world-class performer.

The ‘Big Show’ further speculated on the ‘what if’ scenario, lamenting, ‘You could probably argue where he would fit in that world-class lineup. … Had he come a generation or two later, he would have played 120 Test matches, but he was a superstar.’ This powerful statement from Maxwell speaks volumes, suggesting that Hodge possessed the pedigree and temperament for an enduring Test career, had he simply been born into a different cricketing landscape.

A Domestic Giant: The True Measure of Hodge’s Prowess

While his international Test career might have been fleeting, Brad Hodge’s true legacy is etched deeply into the fabric of Australian first-class cricket. His domestic record is nothing short of colossal, painting the picture of a batsman who consistently dominated attacks and piled on runs with remarkable regularity. Across 223 first-class matches and 388 innings, Hodge amassed an astounding 17,084 runs at a stellar average of 48.81. This monumental tally included a remarkable 51 centuries and 64 half-centuries, with a highest score of 302*.

These figures place Hodge among the pantheon of Australian domestic legends, a testament to his unwavering consistency, technical proficiency, and sheer appetite for scoring runs. In an era where many players would transition to international cricket and back, Hodge remained a bedrock of Victorian cricket, a beacon of reliability and destructive elegance. His first-class statistics are not just numbers; they represent years of grinding performances, relentless dedication, and an unyielding commitment to his craft. To achieve such figures in a competitive domestic circuit highlights a player of genuine substance, fully justifying Maxwell’s ‘superstar’ tag.

Beyond red-ball cricket, Hodge also showcased his versatility and effectiveness in the shorter formats. In List A cricket, he scored 9,127 runs in 241 innings across 251 matches at an average of 43.25, including 29 centuries and 38 fifties. His overall T20 record is equally impressive, cementing his status as one of the format’s early pioneers and most prolific scorers globally. In 277 T20 matches and 261 innings, he accumulated 7,842 runs at an average of 36.84, with two centuries and 48 half-centuries, striking at a rate of 131.28. Even in his limited international white-ball outings for Australia (25 ODIs and 15 T20Is), he scored 575 runs (at 30.26, with a century) and 183 runs (at 26.14, strike rate 127.08) respectively, providing glimpses of his destructive potential.

Maxwell’s Modern-Day Appraisal: A Nod to Mark Chapman

Maxwell’s discerning eye for talent wasn’t limited to past legends. During the same podcast, he also lauded New Zealand’s Mark Chapman, with whom he recently shared the dressing room for the Belfast Wolves in the European T20 Premier League (ETPL). Maxwell expressed his admiration for Chapman, stating, ‘The guy I have been playing with a little bit recently, I got to sort of see him a bit more up close and how good he is, is Mark Chapman from New Zealand.’ He further highlighted Chapman’s ‘ball-striking’ as ‘really great’ and conveyed his surprise that Chapman ‘has not played Tests for New Zealand,’ noting that he ‘has really impressed me over the last 18 months and in the time I have been playing with him.’

Chapman’s career trajectory, while different, presents a contemporary echo of the selection challenges faced by players like Hodge. Having initially represented Hong Kong before becoming eligible for New Zealand, Chapman has established himself as a prominent white-ball cricketer for the Blackcaps. For New Zealand, he has featured in 35 ODIs, scoring 906 runs in 31 innings at an average of 32.35 and a strike rate of 104.86, including two centuries and five fifties. His T20I record for New Zealand is even more extensive, with 94 appearances, scoring 1,682 runs in 77 innings at an average of 26.69 and an impressive strike rate of 142.42, including a century and nine fifties.

Maxwell’s praise for Chapman, particularly his observation about the lack of Test caps, implicitly draws a parallel to the challenges of breaking into a well-established side, even in a different era and country. It underscores the enduring reality that some talents, regardless of their prowess, might be pigeonholed or simply face an insurmountable wall of competition in certain formats.

The Enduring Debate of Talent vs. Opportunity

Glenn Maxwell’s recent comments serve as a powerful reminder of the intricate relationship between raw talent, statistical output, and the unpredictable forces of opportunity and timing in professional cricket. Brad Hodge’s case remains a classic example of a cricketer whose domestic dominance and brief international brilliance pointed towards a far more extensive Test career, only to be curtailed by the extraordinary depth of his era.

Maxwell, himself a cricketer who has faced scrutiny over his Test opportunities despite his immense talent, understands the nuances of selection and the weight of expectation. His advocacy for Hodge, and his keen observation of Chapman, highlight his perspective as a player who values substance and performance. The ‘underrated’ tag often refers to players whose statistical impact doesn’t fully capture their influence or potential. In Hodge’s case, the statistics that *do* exist, particularly his first-class and brief Test averages, only amplify the sense of a Test career unfulfilled.

As fans and pundits, we often debate the ‘greatest XI’ or ‘most impactful players,’ but Maxwell’s insights prompt us to consider a different category: the ‘greatest what-ifs.’ Brad Hodge undoubtedly stands tall among them, a testament to a talent that burned brightly, but perhaps not as long as it deserved, under the international sun. His story, championed by a modern star, ensures that his ‘superstar’ status, though primarily celebrated domestically, continues to resonate in the broader narrative of Australian cricket.


Disclaimer: This coverage is based on reporting from NDTV Sports, with additional cricket analysis and context provided by Cricket Mantra.

Share this article:
Written by Arjun Mehta

More in this category: