Hardik Pandya Backed To Make Test Return Despite Injury Concerns: 'Will BCCI Say No?'
Player News
By Cricket Mantra Publisher
5 min read

Pandya’s Test Return: Uthappa Backs All-Rounder, Asks ‘Will BCCI Say No?’ Amid Fitness …

In a landscape increasingly defined by multi-format specialists, the prospect of Hardik Pandya returning to Test cricket has ignited fervent debate among fans and pundits alike. The latest voice to weigh in is former Indian wicketkeeper Robin Uthappa, whose passionate plea for Pandya’s red-ball comeback, despite lingering injury concerns, underscores a perennial challenge for Indian

Share this article:

In a landscape increasingly defined by multi-format specialists, the prospect of Hardik Pandya returning to Test cricket has ignited fervent debate among fans and pundits alike. The latest voice to weigh in is former Indian wicketkeeper Robin Uthappa, whose passionate plea for Pandya’s red-ball comeback, despite lingering injury concerns, underscores a perennial challenge for Indian cricket: finding a genuine pace-bowling all-rounder capable of thriving in the longest format.

Pandya’s Test career, though brief, showcased tantalizing potential. Across 11 matches, he scored 532 runs at an average of 31.29, including a century and four fifties, complemented by 17 wickets at an average of 31.05. These statistics, while not prodigious, hinted at a player who could profoundly impact a Test match, particularly with his aggressive batting and ability to break partnerships. His last appearance in whites for India dates back to 2018, with a persistent back injury sidelining him from the format ever since.

Uthappa’s Strong Endorsement: ‘Will BCCI Say No?’

Robin Uthappa, speaking on his YouTube channel, didn’t mince words in his desire to see Pandya back in the Test arena. He argued that a fit and willing Hardik would be an invaluable asset, especially at the crucial No. 7 spot. ‘If Hardik Pandya returns to the No. 7 spot in Tests, it would be wonderful. The way he’s playing. Anything can happen; it’s cricket. Never say never,’ Uthappa remarked, highlighting Pandya’s current form in white-ball cricket.

The central pillar of Uthappa’s argument rests on the Board of Control for Cricket in India’s (BCCI) potential stance. He firmly believes that if Pandya expresses a genuine desire and commitment to play Test cricket, particularly with the ambition of winning the World Test Championship (WTC), the BCCI would be hard-pressed to deny him. ‘If Hardik decides to play Test cricket, will BCCI ask him not to play? If he says he wants to play and wants to win the World Test Championship (WTC), I don’t think they would say no. I think they are asking him to prove his fitness,’ Uthappa asserted.

This statement cuts to the core of the issue: fitness. While Pandya has managed his workload in T20 and ODI cricket, the physical demands of Test match bowling are on an entirely different plane. Uthappa, however, offered a pragmatic perspective, suggesting that Pandya might not need to bowl marathon spells. ‘Are all-rounders bowling 20 overs? Nitish Kumar is not bowling that much. He’s bowling 12 overs. If he’s to bowl 12-15 overs per innings, I think he can do it the way he’s fit now, the way he’s bowling and batting. It’s his own decision,’ he observed. This implies a potential shift in strategy, where Pandya’s role could be more as a part-time seam option who provides crucial bursts, rather than a frontline bowler.

The Allure of the WTC and India’s Balance Conundrum

Uthappa astutely linked Pandya’s potential return to a broader career aspiration. Having already secured multiple ICC trophies – specifically mentioning the T20 World Cup and the Asia Cup – the WTC remains the missing jewel in Pandya’s crown. ‘He’s won multiple ICC world championships right now. He’s won the ICC trophies – the Asia Cup, the T20 World Cup. He wants to win the ICC World Test Championship; also, then that’s the whole grand slam, right? Which cricketer wouldn’t want to do that for his country? He’s halfway there,’ Uthappa explained. This desire to complete a ‘grand slam’ of ICC titles could be a significant motivator for Pandya to endure the rigors of Test cricket once more.

Pandya’s absence has indeed left a noticeable void in India’s Test XI. The team has ‘flirted with fast-bowling all-round options,’ with players like Shardul Thakur and Nitish Reddy being explored. While these players offer glimpses of potential, none have consistently cemented their place or provided the same blend of pace, swing, and aggressive lower-order hitting that Pandya brings. A fit Hardik at No. 7 would not only bolster the batting lineup but also provide a crucial fourth or fifth seaming option, allowing India to play an extra specialist spinner or batter depending on conditions, thus bringing better balance to the team composition.

The Fast-Bowling Depth Debate: Beyond Bumrah and Siraj

Uthappa also raised pertinent concerns about India’s fast-bowling depth beyond its established stars. ‘For me, right now it’s Siraj and Bumrah, but after that I can’t [find any],’ he admitted, highlighting a potential over-reliance on Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Siraj. While he praised Prasidh Krishna’s efforts, noting he has ‘done well in patches,’ Uthappa felt there was ‘room for improvement’ and that ‘effectiveness that is there in Test cricket is what you want.’ He pondered if his perspective was ‘old school,’ observing that ‘Nowadays, economy rate is not a factor in Test cricket. People are okay going for 5-7 runs an over in the pursuit of trying to take wickets, given the way cricket is played.’

This insight from Uthappa underscores a modern Test cricket trend: aggression over containment. However, the consistent wicket-taking ability and control demanded at the highest level remain paramount. A Hardik Pandya, even if bowling shorter spells, could provide those crucial breakthroughs, easing the pressure on the primary pacers and complementing their efforts. His ability to hit the deck hard and generate disconcerting bounce makes him a unique proposition that India has struggled to replicate.

The Road Ahead: A Personal Choice and BCCI’s Role

Ultimately, Uthappa rightly concluded that the decision rests with Hardik Pandya himself. ‘It’s his own decision,’ he stated. For Hardik, it would involve a significant commitment to red-ball training, managing his body through gruelling multi-day matches, and potentially adjusting his white-ball workload. For the BCCI, it would mean meticulous medical assessment, workload management plans, and potentially creating a specific pathway for his reintegration into the Test squad. The board’s role would be less about saying ‘no’ and more about facilitating a safe and sustainable return, ensuring the player’s long-term well-being while maximizing his contribution to Indian cricket.

The prospect of Hardik Pandya donning the whites again is undeniably exciting. It promises to add a dynamic dimension to India’s Test aspirations, especially in overseas conditions where a genuine pace-bowling all-rounder is gold dust. As Uthappa suggests, with the WTC title tantalizingly within reach, the motivation for Pandya to pursue Test glory has never been higher. The cricketing world will keenly watch if this ‘never say never’ moment translates into a spectacular comeback.


Disclaimer: Cricket Mantra aggregates breaking cricket news from multiple reputable sources, enriching them with in-depth analysis and expert commentary to provide comprehensive coverage for our readers.

Share this article:
Written by Cricket Mantra Publisher

More in this category:

Pandya’s Test Return: Uthappa Backs All-Rounder, Asks ‘Will BCCI Say No?’ Amid Fitness … - CrickMantra | Cricket Mantra