In a compelling move that has ignited debate across the cricketing fraternity, former India all-rounder Irfan Pathan has emphatically called upon the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to recalibrate its One-Day International (ODI) scheduling. This breaking news analysis centers on Pathan’s conviction that an increased volume of 50-over matches, including the reintroduction of multi-nation tournaments, is paramount to sustain the match-fitness and form of veteran stalwarts Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma, specifically eyeing the 2027 ODI World Cup.

Pathan’s proposition comes amidst a crucial juncture in the careers of two of India’s most iconic batters. With both Kohli and Rohit no longer actively participating in Test cricket or the shortest format, T20Is, ODI cricket has emerged as their sole active international domain. This exclusivity, as Pathan rightly points out, has only intensified interest in the 50-over game, primarily due to their ‘unmissable presence’ and the sheer magnitude of their fan following.

The Irfan Pathan Mandate: Reshaping ODI Schedules

Pathan’s suggestions are clear and decisive. During a discussion on Star Sports, he stressed the need for longer bilateral ODI series, advocating for five-match encounters instead of the current standard three. Even more significantly, he proposed the re-establishment of triangular or quadrangular series – formats that, while once a staple of international cricket, have largely faded from the modern calendar.

‘That’s why I am repeatedly saying one thing. Why can’t we have five ODIs instead of three? Why can’t we have a triangular or quadrangular series? Why can’t we arrange that, because these two greats play only one format? It won’t be wrong to say that if a lot of interest has returned to ODI cricket, these two have brought it,’ Pathan stated, underlining his belief in their unique ability to captivate audiences and keep the format relevant.

The ‘Why’: Sustaining Legends for the Long Haul

Pathan’s logic is rooted in the practicalities of elite sport. For players of Kohli and Rohit’s stature, who have consistently performed at the highest level for over a decade, maintaining peak performance requires regular, high-intensity match practice. Sporadic ODI appearances between T20 leagues and Test series might suffice for some, but for those whose primary focus is now exclusively the 50-over game, a more structured and frequent schedule is essential.

The 2027 ODI World Cup is still a significant distance away, yet planning for such a marquee event begins years in advance. By ensuring a steady diet of competitive ODIs, the BCCI can provide Kohli and Rohit with the rhythm and match awareness crucial for their sustained excellence. This isn’t merely about physical fitness, but about mental conditioning, tactical sharpness, and the ability to consistently deliver under pressure – attributes honed through continuous exposure to international match scenarios.

The Broader Context: ODI Cricket’s Fight for Relevance

Pathan’s plea resonates deeply with the ongoing global debate surrounding the future and relevance of ODI cricket. In an era dominated by the glitz and rapid-fire action of T20 leagues, the 50-over format often finds itself caught in a scheduling squeeze. Bilateral series, while offering valuable points in the ODI Super League (prior to its conclusion), sometimes struggle to generate the same sustained excitement as multi-nation tournaments.

The reintroduction of triangular or quadrangular series, as suggested by Pathan, could be a masterstroke in rejuvenating the format. These tournaments historically offered a unique blend of rivalry, points-table drama, and the tantalizing prospect of a final between the top teams. For fans, it’s a more engaging narrative than a standalone bilateral series. And for players, the multi-team environment adds another layer of competitive intensity, simulating the pressures of a World Cup more closely than a two-team contest.

Moreover, Pathan correctly identifies that the magnetism of Kohli and Rohit is a significant draw. Their record-breaking careers, their ability to chase down colossal totals, and their sheer batting artistry are unparalleled. In an age where star power drives viewership, maximizing their presence in their preferred format is a strategic imperative for the BCCI, not just for the players’ benefit, but for the health of ODI cricket itself.

The Domestic Cricket Imperative: A Crucial Complement

Beyond international fixtures, Pathan also offered sage advice regarding domestic cricket. He urged both Kohli and Rohit to actively participate in domestic tournaments when not on national duty, emphasizing its role in maintaining ‘fitness levels and match practice.’

‘The biggest thing is that they are also performing. The World Cup is far away. You will definitely want to think about it, but I am also thinking that the more we get to see them, that these two players should keep playing, keep representing India, and when they are not playing for India, they should keep playing domestic cricket because the more they play, the better it is,’ he noted.

This advice aligns perfectly with recent actions by both players. The original report highlights that both Kohli and Rohit recently played two Vijay Hazare Trophy matches for their respective state teams. Kohli, demonstrating his commitment, has even expressed a desire to play another game for Delhi, likely on January 6. Rohit, meanwhile, is set to return to international action in the upcoming three-match ODI series against New Zealand, commencing January 11.

These domestic stints are invaluable. They offer a lower-pressure environment to fine-tune skills, test new approaches, and maintain game readiness without the intense scrutiny of international cricket. For seasoned professionals, it’s a way to stay sharp and mentally engaged, mitigating the risk of rustiness from extended breaks.

Looking Ahead: BCCI’s Strategic Crossroads

Irfan Pathan’s impassioned plea places the BCCI at a strategic crossroads. On one hand, there’s the undeniable need to manage player workloads, especially with an increasingly packed global calendar. On the other, there’s the imperative to nurture the careers of its greatest assets and ensure the continued popularity of a format that forms a significant part of cricket’s heritage.

Scheduling more ODIs, particularly multi-nation tournaments, presents logistical challenges. It requires coordination with other cricket boards, finding suitable windows in an already congested schedule, and ensuring player availability. However, the potential rewards – sustained interest in ODI cricket, prolonged careers for two legends, and a stronger platform for India’s 2027 World Cup ambitions – are immense.

The debate around Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma’s ODI future isn’t just about two players; it’s about the strategic direction of Indian cricket in the 50-over format. Pathan’s insights offer a compelling roadmap, urging the BCCI to embrace a more proactive and fan-centric approach to ODI scheduling. How the board responds to this call will undoubtedly shape not only the immediate future of these two greats but also the enduring legacy and appeal of ODI cricket in India.

---

Disclaimer: Cricket Mantra aggregates breaking cricket news from multiple reputable sources, enriching them with in-depth analysis and expert commentary to provide comprehensive coverage for our readers.